|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Feb 7, 2014 17:41:10 GMT
Hansolo322 messaged me today explaining that he intends to take back-to-back as meaning the rematch button must be clicked, and if his opponent doesn't accept he would count it as a loss for them.
I was under the impression we don't need to restrict nano rushing. The tournament should be about skill and strategy, not who has more of a unit, right?
We need to make an official ruling on this ASAP.
|
|
|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Feb 7, 2014 22:51:07 GMT
I made an executive decision. Please feel free to express your anger or support  My rationale: this tournament should be about strategy and skill, not about who has more of a given unit. If a player has what they consider an unbeatable formation, they should have the right to keep using it until proven otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by (DN) gbirdc on Feb 8, 2014 0:11:30 GMT
You were dead right Enbee. Good rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Feb 8, 2014 0:25:24 GMT
You were dead right Enbee. Good rule. I sure hope everyone feels this way! And thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by (00N) hairlesspanda on Feb 8, 2014 11:09:42 GMT
oh well, it is what it is.  |
|
|
|
Post by (C61) Kush25 on Feb 12, 2014 17:46:00 GMT
I agree that this rule has worked well in this tournament and I must admit it would be nigh on impossible to police this rule if it were put into place.
But it would be very interesting to have a tournament where participants had to use different formations as the matches progressed this would be especially true if it were a best of 5 matches format.
Kush
|
|
?