Nano Units (poll)

(MSW) Enbee Tournament Director The Human Resoure Posts: 304	Nano Units (poll) Feb 2, 2014 5:46:05 GMT (C61) Kush25 likes this Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (MSW) Enbee on Feb 2, 2014 5:46:05 GMT Two unit max was suggested in discussion, which is why I used that number for this poll. Further discussion is fine, but the sooner we make decisions, the better.

(BSB) shybenji Tournament Director Posts: 117	Nano Units (poll) Feb 2, 2014 11:17:32 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (BSB) shybenji on Feb 2, 2014 11:17:32 GMT I would suggest 3, will go with the majority of course. :-)

(DN) gbirdc Tournament Director Posts: 92	Nano Units (poll) Feb 2, 2014 17:38:50 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (DN) gbirdc on Feb 2, 2014 17:38:50 GMT I posted this in another thread, but as long as LMs are limited, there's not major potential for abuse. So many rich and fun nano units that I would like to not have a limit. So many counters to every unit.
	-damNation-

(BNA) Powderxx Tournament Observer Posts: 3	Nano Units (poll) Feb 4, 2014 21:03:40 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (BNA) Powderxx on Feb 4, 2014 21:03:40 GMT I also agree if LM are limited there are so many nano units that are fun to use .

(BSB) shybenji Tournament Director Posts: 117	Nano Units (poll) Feb 5, 2014 10:51:30 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (BSB) shybenji on Feb 5, 2014 10:51:30 GMT I would suggest that we limit them just to push the need for more standard units. lets say 3?

(C61) Kush25
Tournament Director

Posts: 121

Nano Units (poll) Feb 5, 2014 12:10:15 GMT

Post by (C61) Kush25 on Feb 5, 2014 12:10:15 GMT

Slightly lazy approach but here are my comments on this which I made in the Policy Voting Discussion thread:

I do like Nano Units I must admit that they are a vital part of the game (and my usual FvF formations), but I am glad there is a restriction on Nano units as it adds more of a challenge and will definitely promote contestants having to think outside the box. I would not mind the restriction being lifted to 3 Nano units if everyone agrees.

Just to point out if the matches are back to back as in both players click rematch and the screen immediately moves to the formation placing screen there is no avenue for Nano recalling your troops. We must stress that before the match starts both Contestants need to confirm they are available for at least the next 20minutes with good internet access!!

One query that I have had for a while but that I keep forgetting to raise is AC fragments? They are not OP by any means but are they restricted or not?

Kush

(DN) gbirdc
Tournament Director

Posts: 92

Nano Units (poll) Feb 5, 2014 14:59:02 GMT via mobile (MSW) Enbee likes this

Post by (DN) gbirdc on Feb 5, 2014 14:59:02 GMT

I'd be ok with AC frags. As to nano units, I'm in favor of not having any restrictions (assuming only 1 LM). I think the less restrictions, the better. I don't think being required to put in non-nano units will make the tournament any better or worse. All it would likely lead to are additional trebs anyways. At least without restrictions you can tailor your formation however you see fit. Want to go tankless? Only would really work with multiple nano units. I think less restrictions are better for creativity.

My thoughts at least.

-damNation-

(BSB) shybenji Tournament Director Posts: 117	Nano Units (poll) Feb 5, 2014 21:15:14 GMT (C61) Kush25 likes this Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (BSB) shybenji on Feb 5, 2014 21:15:14 GMT I actually like the idea of limiting nano units.. its not something i have ever done but then makes it more inclusive for all players.

(BNA) Powderxx Tournament Observer Posts: 3	Nano Units (poll) Feb 5, 2014 22:28:13 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (BNA) Powderxx on Feb 5, 2014 22:28:13 GMT I don't mind no restrictions on nano units but wouldn't mind if it was limited to 3 . Can still use some creative formations with a balance of nano and non nano units .

(MSW) Enbee Tournament Director The Human Resoure Posts: 304	Nano Units (poll) Feb 6, 2014 0:07:39 GMT (C61) Kush25 likes this Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (MSW) Enbee on Feb 6, 2014 0:07:39 GMT Let's go ahead and limit this to three. I'll update the rules accordingly.

(BNA) mizzifreak4
Tournament Observer

Posts: 13

Nano Units (poll) Feb 6, 2014 10:10:35 GMT

Post by (BNA) mizzifreak4 on Feb 6, 2014 10:10:35 GMT

3 sounds like a good idea. I was just doing some fvf against Kush and noticed there isn't much good AA that isn't Nanos. 3 sounds like a good idea that way we can balance the amount of air units with the AA and still have room for another handy nano unit such as the Elemental trooper or a Brute.

(00N) hairlesspanda Tournament Observer Posts: 87	Nano Units (poll) Feb 6, 2014 14:47:12 GMT Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by (00N) hairlesspanda on Feb 6, 2014 14:47:12 GMT so is LM consider part of the 3 nano units?

(GOA) PaulCrewe: Please do not sign off on the shoutbox - go to KC5 Participant Registration-->KC5 Role Call and reply to that thread as the others have Nov 17, 2014 15:54:02 GMT

(BSR) bear1426: I work from midnight to 8am EST and am able to play during that time period the most if you need to add players in the eastern hemisphere when making the brackets. Nov 20, 2014 9:43:05 GMT

(GOA) PaulCrewe: Thanks Bear, I took youre schedule into consideration when creating the groups. we should have groups posted soon, just waiting on the last two players to sign off. Nov 21, 2014 14:03:44 GMT