|
|
Post by (GON) grudger on Mar 18, 2014 0:13:33 GMT
GON: grudger and ormammo
|
|
|
|
Post by (00N) hairlesspanda on Mar 18, 2014 4:57:27 GMT
Correct me if I am wrong.... did VT made it to the final four in the last BN fvf Tournament? If not... why are there three members up there lol.
-HP
|
|
|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Mar 18, 2014 5:09:39 GMT
Correct me if I am wrong.... did VT made it to the final four in the last BN fvf Tournament? If not... why are there three members up there lol. -HP Since we didn't get 30 guilds to register, we gave an extra spot to the guilds that signed up first. We did an admittedly poor job of communicating that though. |
|
|
|
Post by (00N) hairlesspanda on Mar 18, 2014 7:13:21 GMT
Just my personal opinion, but to be fair, all guilds should have the same amount of participations. 00N already have 4 members in there (2 automatic entry due to the final 4 rules). BNA and BNG (are "one and the same" according to them) have 4 members in there. So all guilds should have 4 members... for fairness sake. So there won't be any bias and unfair advantage.
However, if guilds failed to registered on time or enroll members on time, then it is what it is.
-HP
|
|
|
|
Post by (00N) hairlesspanda on Mar 18, 2014 7:13:43 GMT
Ps- Why am I the only one saying this lol.... there are a lot of exception to the rules lately.
Eventually, BN FvF officers, you guys, need to enforce the rules you created 100% of the time, not 98% of the time. You don't want guilds that loose in this tournament go back to BN forum and say, "well... we lose because we have only two members while "other" guilds got favored and had more members".
This memo is not direct to Enbee, because I know that Enbee is doing his very best balancing his life outside BN Universe and promoting this tournament. I am just asking the rest of the officers to step up and hold each other accountable. Please enforce that rules that you help created and don't make anymore changes to the rules that was announced on the BN Forum. I don't want to see BN FvF tournament lose its credits.
Best,
-HP
|
|
|
|
Post by (Armada Invencible) spectra67 on Mar 18, 2014 8:32:21 GMT
Our Invencible challengers:
- Santana_morales
- eeggff
Guild: Armada Invencible
Good luck everybody!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by (UN) knie on Mar 18, 2014 10:23:55 GMT
Guild: UN Elite Brigade
Participants: bloodbasher and knie
Timezone: GMT+1
We already signed of on the rules as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by (DN) gbirdc on Mar 18, 2014 13:56:49 GMT
Ps- Why am I the only one saying this lol.... there are a lot of exception to the rules lately. Eventually, BN FvF officers, you guys, need to enforce the rules you created 100% of the time, not 98% of the time. You don't want guilds that loose in this tournament go back to BN forum and say, "well... we lose because we have only two members while "other" guilds got favored and had more members". This memo is not direct to Enbee, because I know that Enbee is doing his very best balancing his life outside BN Universe and promoting this tournament. I am just asking the rest of the officers to step up and hold each other accountable. Please enforce that rules that you help created and don't make anymore changes to the rules that was announced on the BN Forum. I don't want to see BN FvF tournament lose its credits. Best, -HP Hi HP - it wasnt an exception, we were faced with a couple of choices, either cut off the guild list to 14 guilds of 2 each and the 4 finalists to run it to 32 participants. However, over 20 guilds wished to participate. There was no even number to run the tournamnet with the guilds we had and we wanted to be as inclusive as possible. We hoped to have 30 guilds register with 2 participants each to get to 64. That didnt happen. Therefore we offered an extra spot to the guilds that registered first to fill out the brackets. Some chose to have it, some didnt. As you know - it is not easy coordinating so many different schedules. We are all organizing this in our free time and trying to make it as inclusive and fair as possible. We have had positive feedback from most participants so far. I would think you would recognize having 25 guilds participate will make it more fun and "credible" than only having 14. |
|
|
|
Post by (BSB) rucuss21 on Mar 18, 2014 14:18:30 GMT
Tournament participant still needs updating. Iv sign in on the roll call. Name still not on the list . I'm guessing I'm not the only one.
|
|
|
|
Post by (BSB) shybenji on Mar 18, 2014 16:08:23 GMT
Tournament participant still needs updating. Iv sign in on the roll call. Name still not on the list . I'm guessing I'm not the only one. Give us a chance, we will get there, if your name is on this thread you will be in eventually :-) |
|
|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Mar 18, 2014 16:45:56 GMT
Tournament participant still needs updating. Iv sign in on the roll call. Name still not on the list . I'm guessing I'm not the only one. It's possible I missed a few, although I'm confident that when I updated it last night I was pretty thorough and you may be the only one I missed. Regardless, we will be double checking to make sure everything is accurate tomorrow before generating the bracket. |
|
|
|
Post by (NATO)DiggerMic1 on Mar 18, 2014 22:15:10 GMT
Hey!
Could you make me the contact person for NATO alliance. I will also be the only one to enter the contest from our guild.
|
|
|
|
Post by (SCA) mvpserver9 on Mar 19, 2014 0:24:52 GMT
Participants For SCA - Carbaryl & Rystheguy. You're not competing then? Please have carbaryl post on roll call if he is instead. Ok I will have him sign off, IF there can be 3 people from a guil I would love to but rules are rules |
|
|
|
Post by (MSW) Enbee on Mar 19, 2014 0:40:56 GMT
We have you entered mvpserver.
|
|
|
|
Post by (R6) Waxxmann on Mar 19, 2014 4:17:45 GMT
Waxxmann-R6-EST
|
|
?
thanks to all competitors past and present and also the directors for making it happen.
Mar 5, 2015 9:27:19 GMT
thanks to all competitors past and present and also the directors for making it happen.
Mar 5, 2015 9:27:19 GMT
Apr 8, 2015 0:13:54 GMT
Apr 8, 2015 0:13:54 GMT